The New York Observer
  • Betabeat
  • Politicker
  • GalleristNY
  • Commercial
  • VSL
  • PolitickerNJ
  • Observer
  • Betabeat
  • Politicker
  • GalleristNY
  • Scene

Gallerist NY

  • Happenings: This Week in New York
Follow @Gallerist_NY

Emerging Artists Score Records at $79.9 M. Phillips Sale

LAST
/
NEXT
By Dan Duray 11/15/12 11:20pm

Tate Modern Curator Nicholas Cullinan Snapped Up by the Met

  • bqas
    Start The Slideshow

    This evening’s contemporary art auction at Phillips de Pury & Company, the last evening sale of the season, was something of a denouement as auctioneer Simon de Pury hammered down a solid sale that totaled $79.9 million against a presale estimate of $73.6 million to $110.7 million.

    After the results last night at Christie’s, whose record-breaking evening sale of postwar and contemporary art brought in $412 million, the sale seemed a bit lackluster at times, though some results at Phillips were undoubtedly impressive. Early on, new auction records were set for Dan Colen and Tauba Auerbach, whose work was purchased for $290,500 with premium by Jose Mugrabi, Rashid Johnson and Sterling Ruby. The Ruby brought $626,500 with premium, selling to art adviser Julie Miyoshi, who bought it on behalf of a client.

    “We were prepared to go a little higher,” Ms. Miyoshi said after the sale. “We really wanted it.”

    Six artworks failed to sell, leading to a respectable sell-through rate of 83 percent by lot, though some big-ticket items fell notably short of expectations. A Gerhard Richter, Kegel (Cone) (1985), hammered for just $11 million, below an estimate of $12 million to $18 million. A Jean-Michel Basquiat, Humidity (1982) hammered for just $9 million, below its estimate of $12 million to $18 million, and a pair of Andy Warhols, one of Mao Zedong, the other of Jackie Kennedy, went at just above their low estimates. And all of those lots carried third-party guarantees, meaning they were pre-sold before the auction. Perhaps because it was the last auction of the season, there was a good amount of chatter in the room for the first few lots, despite the records, and it soon fell silent as the Richter, at lot 8, failed to meet its low estimate.

    On the lower-end lots, however, there was plenty to like. Art advisor Patricia Marshall picked up a John Chamberlain sculpture for Eugenio Lopez’s Jumex Collection in Mexico. The Paris dealer Thaddaeus Ropac bought a work by George Baselitz, whom he represents, for $1.7 million with premium, and Italian dealer Nicolo Cardi bid on the Sterling Ruby, along with works by Rosemarie Trockel, Sturtevant and Richard Prince. The Prince, one of the artist’s to-the-margins, text-centric Joke Paintings, also saw bidding from Alberto Mugrabi and some unconventional banter from Mr. de Pury.

    “I do recommend reading the joke,” he said after it hammered below estimate at $550,000. “I particularly like the second part of it.” (er, that half, verbatim, “TO A FRIEND, ‘DO YOU LIKE PUSSY?’ HE SAYS, ‘DO I LIKE PUSSY?’ ‘MAN IF IT WERE AIR-CONDITIONED I’D LIVE IN IT!’”)

    It was something of a relaxed sale in general. Attendees lingered afterward. Dealer Helly Nahmad lectured a small group that included Leonardo DiCaprio before a Basquiat from the sale, looking very much like a docent as he explained the value of words like SAMO, or the image of a crown. “It’s always the question of quality versus real estate,” Mr. Nahmad told the group.

    In a post-sale press conference, Phillips’ CEO Michael McGinnis said that despite just beating the low estimate he was “thrilled” with the results. He conceded that there were fewer bids than they might usually expect from such a sale, but there was “a lot of global coverage,” usually desirable for auction houses.

    After the sale, Miami-based collector Donald Rubell, known for his prescience in acquiring work by emerging artists, looked past the mediocre prices of the top lots and praised Phillips for what it does best.

    “It wasn’t the spectacular nature of last night’s sale,” he said, “but I think younger artists do better here than they do anywhere else.”

    “I wish they’d stick to only young artists,” he added, “but I guess it’s very hard to make a living only doing young artists. We need [Phillips], it’s a great incubator. They’re doing a service to all of us, so if they want to sell the expensive stuff, they should sell it. But for cutting-edge artists, they’re the best.”

    All prices courtesy of Artnet, all images courtesy of Phillips de Pury & Company.

  • Back Forward bqas

    bqas

  • Back Forward $13.5 million | Andy Warhol, Mao, 1973

    $13.5 million | Andy Warhol, Mao, 1973

    Estimate: $12 million to $18 million

  • Back Forward $12.4 million | Andy Warhol, Nine Jackies, 1964

    $12.4 million | Andy Warhol, Nine Jackies, 1964

    Estimate: $10 million to $15 million

  • Back Forward $12.4 million | Gerhard Richter, Kegel (Cone), 1985

    $12.4 million | Gerhard Richter, Kegel (Cone), 1985

    Estimate: $12 million to $18 million

  • Back Forward $10.2 million | Jean-Michel Basquiat, Humditity, 1982

    $10.2 million | Jean-Michel Basquiat, Humditity, 1982

    Estimate: $12 million to $18 million

  • Back Forward $4.1 million | Jean-Michel Basquiat, Self Portrait, 1982

    $4.1 million | Jean-Michel Basquiat, Self Portrait, 1982

    Estimate: $2.5 million to $3.5 million

  • Back Forward $4 million | Alexander Calder, The Whiffletree, 1936

    $4 million | Alexander Calder, The Whiffletree, 1936

    Estimate: $3.5 million to $5.5 million

  • Back Forward $3.7 million | Jean-Michel Basquiat, Radium 23, 1982-1983

    $3.7 million | Jean-Michel Basquiat, Radium 23, 1982-1983

    Estimate: $3 million to $5 million

  • Back Forward $3.2 million | Alexander Calder, Model for Rosenhof, 1953

    $3.2 million | Alexander Calder, Model for Rosenhof, 1953

    Estimate: $3 million to $4 million

  • Back Forward $1.8 million | Cady Noland, Clip on Method, 1989

    $1.8 million | Cady Noland, Clip on Method, 1989

    Estimate: $1.5 million to $2.5 million

  • Back $1.8 million | Joan Mitchell, The Lake, 1981

    $1.8 million | Joan Mitchell, The Lake, 1981

    Estimate: $1.5 million to $2.5 million

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google +1
  • Email
  • Print
Next in Gallerist

Connect With Us

Send

If you'd like us to follow up in regard to this tip, please remember to leave some form of contact information.

Send

Most Popular

Across the Wire

  • sad

    Michael Hastings Dies In Car Accident

  • Housing for All

    Alms for the Upper Middle Class: Subsidized Apartments Aim at $200K Earners

  • Up & Down the Street

    The Return of Wall Street’s Cassandra: In Armani and Pearls, Meredith Whitney Smacks Back

  • theater

    To Error Is Human: The Slapstick Shakespeare in the Park Is Irresistible

  • Race to Gracie Mansion 2013

    55% of New Yorkers Can't Name a Single Mayoral Candidate

    • About
    • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Policy
    • Masthead
    • Advertise With Us
Powered by WordPress.com VIP
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.