<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GalleristNY &#187; Is the Chinese Art Market Really on the Skids?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://galleristny.com/2011/11/is-the-chinese-art-market-really-on-the-skids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://galleristny.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:50:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='galleristny.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://galleristny.com/osd.xml" title="GalleristNY" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://galleristny.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Is the Chinese Art Market Really on the Skids?</title>

		<comments>http://galleristny.com/2011/11/is-the-chinese-art-market-really-on-the-skids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:52:30 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://galleristny.com/2011/11/is-the-chinese-art-market-really-on-the-skids/</link>
			<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleristny.com/?p=4777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_4783" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nyogalleristny.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/ivory_2055461c.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4783" title="ivory_2055461c" src="http://nyogalleristny.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/ivory_2055461c.jpg?w=300&h=187" alt="" width="300" height="187" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The ivory stamp that sold high above its estimate at Christie&#039;s London. Courtesy Telegraph.</p></div></p>
<p>It seems that once a month someone new sounds off on how the Chinese art market is struggling. Recall, back in October<a href="http://www.galleristny.com/2011/10/marion-maneker-vs-reuters-a-fight-worthy-of-pay-per-view/"></a>, when Reuters claimed the market was lagging even though the evidence seemed to suggest otherwise (<a href="http://www.galleristny.com/2011/10/marion-maneker-vs-reuters-a-fight-worthy-of-pay-per-view/">they had to face the wrath of Marion Maneker for that</a>). In the <em>Telegraph</em>, Colin Gleadell has a short piece (or a long paragraph) on how <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/artsales/8889772/Chinese-art-market-losing-steam.html">the Chinese market is "losing steam"</a> based on London's Asian art sales.</p>
<p>Strangely, he begins with a number of positive notes.</p>
<p><!--more-->Christie's sold £28 million worth of Chinese antiquities (about $44.4 million). Bonhams sold a Chinese vase for £9 million ($14.28 million). Christie's, according to the <em>Telegraph</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Might claim the    biggest surprise. In its South Kensington sale, a tiny ivory stamp with a    carved lion handle, described as 19th or 20th century, had been bought by a    British collector in Hong Kong in the 1940’s, and was estimated at £3,000 [$4,759].    Imagine the owner’s face when it sold for £646,000 [just over $1 million]."</p></blockquote>
<p>His conclusion: "Overall, though, some    steam has gone out of the Chinese market as many of the higher valued lots    went unsold."</p>
<p>In other news, <em>Artforum</em> reports that <a href="http://artforum.com/news/#news29533">the Shanghai city government has announced plans to</a> construct 16 "major museums and galleries" in the city by 2015. One gallery, set to open in October of 2012 in the transformed China Pavilion space, is 23,000 square feet; it is called China Art Palace.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_4783" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nyogalleristny.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/ivory_2055461c.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4783" title="ivory_2055461c" src="http://nyogalleristny.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/ivory_2055461c.jpg?w=300&h=187" alt="" width="300" height="187" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The ivory stamp that sold high above its estimate at Christie&#039;s London. Courtesy Telegraph.</p></div></p>
<p>It seems that once a month someone new sounds off on how the Chinese art market is struggling. Recall, back in October<a href="http://www.galleristny.com/2011/10/marion-maneker-vs-reuters-a-fight-worthy-of-pay-per-view/"></a>, when Reuters claimed the market was lagging even though the evidence seemed to suggest otherwise (<a href="http://www.galleristny.com/2011/10/marion-maneker-vs-reuters-a-fight-worthy-of-pay-per-view/">they had to face the wrath of Marion Maneker for that</a>). In the <em>Telegraph</em>, Colin Gleadell has a short piece (or a long paragraph) on how <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/artsales/8889772/Chinese-art-market-losing-steam.html">the Chinese market is "losing steam"</a> based on London's Asian art sales.</p>
<p>Strangely, he begins with a number of positive notes.</p>
<p><!--more-->Christie's sold £28 million worth of Chinese antiquities (about $44.4 million). Bonhams sold a Chinese vase for £9 million ($14.28 million). Christie's, according to the <em>Telegraph</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Might claim the    biggest surprise. In its South Kensington sale, a tiny ivory stamp with a    carved lion handle, described as 19th or 20th century, had been bought by a    British collector in Hong Kong in the 1940’s, and was estimated at £3,000 [$4,759].    Imagine the owner’s face when it sold for £646,000 [just over $1 million]."</p></blockquote>
<p>His conclusion: "Overall, though, some    steam has gone out of the Chinese market as many of the higher valued lots    went unsold."</p>
<p>In other news, <em>Artforum</em> reports that <a href="http://artforum.com/news/#news29533">the Shanghai city government has announced plans to</a> construct 16 "major museums and galleries" in the city by 2015. One gallery, set to open in October of 2012 in the transformed China Pavilion space, is 23,000 square feet; it is called China Art Palace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://galleristny.com/2011/11/is-the-chinese-art-market-really-on-the-skids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyogalleristny.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/ivory_2055461c.jpg?w=300&#38;h=187" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ivory_2055461c</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
